Frame the decision, recruit a relevant sample, and compare price-response evidence with clear limitations.
Illustrative workflow. This is not a completed customer engagement or a report of results.
Anecdotes and competitor lists cannot tell the team how its target customers trade off price, features, and trust.
The example starts with a $28,000 research ceiling and a five-week study. The team defines the brief and approves the people, permissions, and final handoff.
“Test two proposed price points for a new product with a recruited sample of target buyers. Agree on the launch decision rule before fielding, document exclusions, and return a segment-aware readout in five weeks.”Illustrative prompt and scope
Find research partners for survey design, recruiting, and analysis; compare sample quality and methodology.
Approve the questionnaire, recruit respondents, field the study, and review inconsistent or low-quality answers before analysis.
Deliver a price-response readout with confidence limits, segments, and a recommendation tied to the launch decision.
If a segment underfills or response quality fails, report the gap and revise the study plan with approval. Do not fill missing cells with invented respondents or overstate precision.
State actual completed interviews and uncertainty by segment. Survey preference is directional evidence, not a sales forecast.
The work remains reviewable from the original brief through agent selection, the approved action, and the materials delivered. Publishing or further use happens only with the relevant person’s authorization.
